‘Conscientious Objection’ Reason Enough to Refuse mRNA Vaccines as Preventive Treatment for COVID-19: Study

Click here to read the full article.

A Canadian study published in a peer-reviewed international journal proposes that “conscientious objection” is adequate reason to refuse mRNA vaccines as a preventive treatment against COVID-19.

The study was published on Aug. 23 in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research. Its five co-authors include Dr. Patrick Provost and Dr. Nicolas Derome—two professors who were recently suspended by Quebec’s Laval University for questioning the need to vaccinate children against COVID-19.

Other co-authors include Dr. Bernard Massie, retired director general of the Human Health Therapeutics Research Centre at the National Research Council of Canada, Dr. Christian Linard, a professor at the department of chiropractic at the University of Quebec at Trois-Rivières, and Dr. Jean Caron, a retired professor at McGill University’s department of psychiatry.

According to the study, some vaccines—such as Sinovac Biotech’s CoronaVac and Bharat Biotech BBV152—were produced on the basis of traditional technology using inactivated virus, while other injectable formulations were based on viral vectors—such as the vaccines produced by AstraZeneca, Janssen, and CanSino Biotech—or experimental genetic products based on mRNA as developed by Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna.

Continue reading here.

Scroll down for comments and share your thoughts!

What do you think?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

GIPHY App Key not set. Please check settings

[Premiering at 8PM ET] Pastor Takes CRT to Church | Church & State

Nearly Every Food in This Diet Can Kill Cancer Cells