The Western Journal
Click here to read the full article.
On Monday, Hunter Biden was in an Arkansas courtroom, trying to convince a judge overseeing his paternity case that his child support payments need to be reduced.
After all, the son of the president of the United States of America is a mere starving artist — a globe-trotting, world-famous starving artist who was, rather recently, making deals with huge international concerns.
Mind you, Hunter Biden mostly refuses to acknowledge the existence of his daughter, 4-year-old Navy Joan Roberts. In his memoir, he claims to not even remember the encounter with then-stripper Lunden Roberts that led to the girl’s conception. I’m sure she’ll love reading that when she’s older.
Nor does Hunter’s father or stepmother want to recognize his love child, as much as they like to talk about “family.” Despite DNA tests proving that Hunter is the father, Navy Joan’s name has continuously been omitted from any mention of Joe or Jill Biden’s grandchildren. Her name is excluded when the stockings are hung at the White House at Christmastime.
Hunter and his well-heeled defense team didn’t have a great day in court on Monday as they tried to have Hunter’s $20,000-a-month child support payments reduced. Among other things, according to Fox News, the judge said that the legal ability to redact certain information is “being abused” by Hunter’s side, and said “I can’t gag the whole world” regarding tax information on the infamous Hunter Biden laptop.
But isn’t Joe Biden supposed to be a family man? That’s why the Daily Mail’s Emily Goodin had a question for White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre on Tuesday: Is the president, say, monitoring the high-profile court hearing that might determine the future of his granddaughter?
Jean-Pierre’s response was both infuriating and predictable:
Continue reading here.
Scroll down for comments and share your thoughts!
GIPHY App Key not set. Please check settings