‘The Wolf of Wall Street’ Reveals the Suspicious Nature of Pelosi’s Stock Market Success

Click here to read the full article.

When even a man who’s earned the moniker “The Wolf of Wall Street” is calling out the suspicious timing of your stock transactions, you know it must be really bad.

Those who are familiar with movies are probably familiar with Jordan Belfort, the pump-and-dump stock trader and anti-hero whose life and times on Wall Street inspired the 2013 Martin Scorsese movie that bears his nickname.

It would also inspire federal prosecutors to put him behind bars for 22 months and fine him $110 million for securities fraud, as NPR noted after the release of Belfort’s 2007 memoir, also called “The Wolf of Wall Street.”

The point is that if someone knows about shady stock dealings, it’s Belfort. And, in an interview with former Fox News host Tucker Carlson on “The Tucker Carlson show” published Friday on the social media platform X, the wolf said it was awfully funny how former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and her husband, Paul, a businessman and founder of the investment firm Financial Leasing Services Inc, seemed to consistently beat seasoned pros.

The gist of the interview before that point was that the average lay investor is better off putting money into the S&P 500 — an index of the 500 largest companies on U.S. stock exchanges — than trying to make picks individually or timing the market.

However, as Carlson pointed out about 24 minutes into the interview, “it appears that members of Congress consistently beat the S&P 500 in their personal investments.”

Without skipping a beat, Belfort shot back with, “Nancy Pelosi.”

Continue reading here.

Scroll down for comments and share your thoughts!

What do you think?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

GIPHY App Key not set. Please check settings

BREAKING: Libs of TikTok SUSPENDED from Facebook for violating ‘community standards’

Jack Smith asks DC appellate court to reject Trump's claim of presidential immunity in J6 case