Trump Attorneys Respond to Jack Smith with Court Filing, Say ‘234-Year Unbroken Tradition’ Is on Their Side

Click here to read the full article.

Former President Donald Trump’s lawyers responded to special counsel Jack Smith ahead of oral arguments, writing that a “234-year unbroken tradition” supports Trump’s claim to presidential immunity from prosecution.

Quoting extensively from early Americans like Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall and Justice Joseph Story, his attorneys argue in a 41-page brief that impeachment is the proper check on “official acts” taken by presidents, not criminal prosecution.

The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals is scheduled to hear oral arguments in Trump’s bid to dismiss his election interference case based on presidential immunity on Tuesday.

“Punishment of a President always involves political considerations going beyond guilt or innocence,” Trump’s lawyers wrote. “The Framers recognized that, and they delegated to Congress the power to weigh those political considerations in the first instance.”

“To allow prosecution after acquittal usurps that role and undermines the mechanism the Framers used to temper political passions: impeachment in the House and trial in the Senate,” they continued.

The Senate voted in February 2021 to acquit Trump in his second impeachment trial, in which he faced the charge of inciting an insurrection on Jan. 6, 2021.

Trump’s attorneys wrote that the government relies on facts “outside the indictment” to suggest Trump is responsible for the events of Jan. 6 and “selectively omits key facts,” like Trump telling protesters assembled in Washington, D.C., that day to “peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard.”

Continue reading here.

Scroll down for comments and share your thoughts!